Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Lexus LX 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 67 HP more power than Lexus LX, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Lexus LX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus LX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm shorter than the Lexus LX, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 701 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1943 litres | 1267 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover has 62 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 676 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Lexus LX. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`290 kg | 3`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`504 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 786 kg | 840 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem less than Lexus LX. Therefore, Lexus LX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 94 600 | 102 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus LX has
| |