Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Lexus LX 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 67 HP more power than Lexus LX, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Lexus LX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus LX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm shorter than the Lexus LX, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 701 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1267 litres | |
|
Lexus LX has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 62 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Lexus LX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`290 | 3`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 114 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus LX has
| |