Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Lexus GX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Lexus GX) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 438 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 43 HP more power than Lexus GX, whereas torque is 302 NM more than Lexus GX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 12.8 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus GX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 660 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus GX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Land Cruiser, Lexus GS, Toyota Tundra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus GX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 12 cm longer than the Lexus GX, 19 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 621 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 639 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1832 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.7 metres more than that of the Lexus GX, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`290 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 112 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus GX has
| |