Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 24 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 297 mm (11.7 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1943 litres | 1886 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 24 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 57 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`100 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`253 kg | 2`078 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 847 kg | 672 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Volvo XC90. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 94 600 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |