Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 59 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 71 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover has 24 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 112 400 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |