Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 235 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 480 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.7 | |
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 71 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 2.01 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 368 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 271 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | 2`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 112 400 | 45 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |