Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 79 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 127 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 10.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 19 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 424 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 112 400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |