Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover and Toyota Land Cruiser have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover torque is 150 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 9.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1943 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`100 kg | 3`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`253 kg | 2`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 847 kg | 710 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 94 600 | 54 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |