Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Mercedes G class 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 38 HP more power than Mercedes G class, but torque is 40 NM less than Mercedes G class. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 11.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes G class, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 297 mm (11.7 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mercedes G klase 2012 3.0 engine: A reliable yet dynamic engine. Frequent oil leaks, engine crankcase ventilation problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.95 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 33 cm longer than the Mercedes G class, 31 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1943 litres | 2250 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover has 159 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes G class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes G class (by 307 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 13.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes G class, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`100 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`253 kg | 2`515 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 847 kg | 685 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Mercedes G class. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 94 600 | 114 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes G klase has
| |