Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2017 -
Land Rover Range Rover
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 249 HP258 HP
Torque: 500 NM600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds7.9 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 engine produces 9 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover 2013, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover 2013.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.5
The Land Rover Range Rover 2017 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2013, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover 2017 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 86 litres85 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1210 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.00 m5.00 m
Width: 2.07 m2.07 m
Height: 1.87 m1.84 m
Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover 2017 and Land Rover Range Rover 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 639 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2030 litres
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 has more luggage capacity.
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 has 89 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover 2013.
Turning diameter: 12.3 meters12.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`1003`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 112 40047 800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv