Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Ford Explorer 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Explorer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover and Ford Explorer have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover torque is 154 NM more than Ford Explorer. Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 12.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 5.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 825 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 595 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover has 44 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. The Ford Explorer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 95 400 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |