Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Durango) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 45 HP less power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 147 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 11.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 297 mm (11.7 inches) | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 639 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1943 litres | 2410 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 467 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres less than that of the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`100 kg | 2`948 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`253 kg | 2`184 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 847 kg | 764 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Dodge Durango. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 94 000 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |