Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs BMW X7 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 340 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 700 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
BMW X7 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 91 HP less power than BMW X7, whereas torque is 200 NM less than BMW X7. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 80 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 5.15 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is 15 cm shorter than the BMW X7, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 326 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2120 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover has 313 litres more trunk space than the BMW X7. The BMW X7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X7, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | 3`295 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 94 600 | 85 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X7 has
| |