Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs BMW X6 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover and BMW X6 have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover torque is 60 NM less than BMW X6. Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.0 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1540 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 297 mm (11.7 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm longer than the BMW X6, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1943 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 59 litres more trunk space than the BMW X6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 418 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`100 kg | 2`780 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`253 kg | 2`065 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 847 kg | 715 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than BMW X6. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 94 000 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X6 has
| |