Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs BMW X5 2013

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2017 -
BMW X5
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 249 HP381 HP
Torque: 500 NM740 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds5.3 seconds
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 132 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 240 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.7
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 86 litres85 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle1260 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1370 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.00 m4.89 m
Width: 2.07 m1.94 m
Height: 1.87 m1.76 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm longer than the BMW X5, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 639 litres650 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1870 litres
Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 11 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.3 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5.
Gross weight (kg): 3`1002`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 114 40028 400
Pros and Cons:
    BMW X5 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv