Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs BMW X5 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 381 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 740 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 132 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 240 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm longer than the BMW X5, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 650 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 11 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | 2`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 112 400 | 27 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW X5 has
| |