Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Audi Q7 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 272 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 600 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 23 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.1 | |
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1570 km on highway | ||
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 5.01 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 1.97 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.74 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover and Audi Q7 are practically the same length. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 770 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 770 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 639 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1955 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q7. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | 2`940 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 112 400 | 34 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q7 has
| |