Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Land Rover Range Rover) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 380 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 145 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 7.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 271 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`070 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 100 400 | 45 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |