Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2017 -
Land Rover Range Rover
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 380 HP258 HP
Torque: 450 NM600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds7.9 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 engine produces 122 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover 2013, but torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover 2013. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.77.5
The Land Rover Range Rover 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover 2017 could require 480 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 86 litres85 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1210 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover SportInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover 2013 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Land Rover Range Rover 2013 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 5.00 m5.00 m
Width: 2.07 m2.07 m
Height: 1.87 m1.84 m
Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover 2017 and Land Rover Range Rover 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 639 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2030 litres
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 has more luggage capacity.
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 has 89 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover 2013.
Turning diameter: no data12.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`0703`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 112 40047 800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv