Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 380 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 86 HP more power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 11.2 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 639 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`070 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 91 200 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |