Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Mercedes GLE 2015
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Mercedes GLE), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 96 HP more power than Mercedes GLE, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mercedes GLE. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.8 l/100km + 25.8 kWh/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 13.00 € | 12.80 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 202 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mercedes GLE 2015 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Mercedes GLE, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1943 litres | 2010 litres | |
|
Mercedes GLE has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLE (by 67 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLE, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`250 kg | 2`950 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`502 kg | 2`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 748 kg | 875 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Mercedes GLE. Therefore, Mercedes GLE is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 95 000 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes GLE has
| |