Land Rover Range Rover 1988 vs Ford Maverick 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford Maverick is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.2 | 2.4 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 - 203 HP | 101 - 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 - 340 NM | 197 - 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 19.8 seconds | 14 - 19.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 15.9 | 10.1 - 11.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Maverick. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |