Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.6 | 2.4 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 99 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 211 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.5 seconds | 10 - 25.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 16.5 | 11.0 - 14.5 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`073 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |