Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1994 - 2002
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Land Rover Range Rover is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.5 - 4.62.5 - 5.9

Performance

Power: 136 - 226 HP116 - 237 HP
Torque: 270 - 400 NM278 - 472 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 - 17.5 seconds8.2 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.6 - 16.59.9 - 17.9
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.50 m
Width: 1.89 m1.77 m
Height: 1.82 m1.65 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 21 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 17 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data1136 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2255 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 3`500~ 2`410
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 40004800
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower price
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv