Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Jeep Cherokee 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.6 | 2.5 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 116 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 198 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.5 seconds | 10.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 16.5 | 9.5 - 14.0 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 46 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2033 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`169 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |