Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Nissan Patrol 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.6 | 2.8 - 4.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 129 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 252 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.5 seconds | 10.8 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 16.5 | 10.8 - 18.2 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Patrol. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 28 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 810 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2287 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`881 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 9600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
| |