Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Mercedes ML 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.6 | 2.7 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 163 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 310 - 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.5 seconds | 6.7 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 16.5 | 9.4 - 14.8 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`481 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |