Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Ford Explorer 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford Explorer is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.6 (petrol, diesel) | 4.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 16.5 | 13.7 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Explorer, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`568 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |