Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs BMW X5 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.6 | 3.0 - 4.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 218 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 300 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.5 seconds | 6.1 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 16.5 | 8.6 - 14.0 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm longer than the BMW X5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`666 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X5 has
| |