Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 282 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 - 440 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.6 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.2 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |