Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Land Rover Range Rover is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Touareg has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 2.5 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 - 282 HP | 175 - 450 HP | |
Torque: | 390 - 440 NM | 305 - 750 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.6 seconds | 5.9 - 12.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.2 | 9.6 - 15.9 | |
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touareg. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touareg, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`958 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Volkswagen Touareg has
| |