Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 282 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 - 440 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.6 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.2 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 6.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 44 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |