Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 2.9 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 282 HP | 174 - 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 - 440 NM | 390 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.6 seconds | 7.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.2 | 11.3 - 16.0 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover 2005. On average, a Land Rover Range Rover 2002 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Land Rover Range Rover 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover 2002 and Land Rover Range Rover 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |