Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 2.7 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 282 HP | 190 - 390 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 - 440 NM | 425 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.6 seconds | 7.6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.2 | 10.2 - 15.9 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |