Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Audi Q7 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Audi Q7 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 5.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 282 HP | 233 - 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 - 440 NM | 360 - 1000 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.6 seconds | 5.5 - 9.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.2 | 10.5 - 13.6 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q7. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Range Rover is 14 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`039 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |