Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 3.6 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 - 396 HP | 272 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 - 640 NM | 510 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.6 seconds | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.0 | 9.4 - 14.9 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover 2009. On average, Land Rover Range Rover 2005 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover 2009, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover 2009, which means Land Rover Range Rover 2005 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |