Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 2.7 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 - 396 HP | 190 - 390 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 - 640 NM | 425 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.6 seconds | 7.6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.0 | 10.2 - 15.9 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 960 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 425 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |