Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2009 - 2013
Jeep Grand Cherokee
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 3.6 - 5.03.0 - 6.4

Performance

Power: 272 - 510 HP241 - 468 HP
Torque: 510 - 700 NM347 - 630 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 9.2 seconds4.8 - 9.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 14.98.3 - 14.1
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.82 m
Width: 2.03 m1.94 m
Height: 1.87 m1.78 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 15 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 535 litres994 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1554 litres
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 459 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 3`200~ 2`949
Safety:
Land Rover Range Rover scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Grand Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 15 60010 800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv