Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 3.6 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 4.1 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 272 - 510 HP | 204 - 340 HP | |
Torque: | 510 - 700 NM | 360 - 800 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | 5.8 - 9.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 14.9 | 7.2 - 9.9 | |
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touareg. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.97 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.71 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 18 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touareg, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 580 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
Volkswagen Touareg has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touareg. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touareg. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 2`865 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 13 800 | 14 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Touareg has
| |