Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2009 - 2013
Volkswagen Touareg
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 3.6 - 5.03.0 - 4.1

Performance

Power: 272 - 510 HP204 - 340 HP
Torque: 510 - 700 NM360 - 800 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 9.2 seconds5.8 - 9.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 14.97.2 - 9.9
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touareg. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.80 m
Width: 2.03 m1.94 m
Height: 1.87 m1.71 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 18 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touareg, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 535 litres580 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1642 litres
Volkswagen Touareg has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touareg. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touareg.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 3`200~ 2`865
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 15 20015 400
Pros and Cons:
    Volkswagen Touareg has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv