Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 5.0 | 4.2 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 510 HP | 204 - 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 - 700 NM | 430 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | 11.2 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 14.9 | 11.1 - 16.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |