Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 5.0 | 2.9 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 510 HP | 174 - 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 - 700 NM | 390 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | 7.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 14.9 | 11.3 - 16.0 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover 2005. On average, Land Rover Range Rover 2009 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2009 is larger. Land Rover Range Rover 2009 is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover 2009 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover 2009 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, which means Land Rover Range Rover 2009 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |