Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 510 HP | 258 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 - 700 NM | 510 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 14.9 | 7.5 - 13.8 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover 2012. On average, Land Rover Range Rover 2009 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.05 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover 2009 is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover 2012, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover 2009 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover 2009 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover 2009 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`117 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 51 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |