Land Rover Range Rover 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 3.6 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 - 510 HP | 272 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 - 700 NM | 510 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 13.8 | 9.4 - 14.9 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover 2009. On average, Land Rover Range Rover 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 2.05 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover 2012 is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover 2009, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover 2012 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
| Land Rover Range Rover 2012 has 15 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover 2009. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover 2012 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`117 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |