Land Rover Range Rover 2012 vs BMW X5 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 - 510 HP | 218 - 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 - 700 NM | 350 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | 5 - 8.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 13.8 | 5.6 - 10.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 2.05 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 12 cm longer than the BMW X5, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 100 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`117 | ~ 2`803 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 50 200 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X5 has
| |