Land Rover Range Rover 2021 vs Mercedes GLC 2023
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes GLC can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes GLC also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 | 1.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 615 HP | 163 - 476 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 - 800 NM | 250 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 8.3 seconds | 3.5 - 9 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mercedes GLC. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.8 - 11.9 | 0.6 - 10.2 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GLC. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 284 - 295 mm (11.2 - 11.6 inches) | 158 - 300 mm (6.2 - 11.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.60 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 818 litres | 545 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1490 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mercedes GLC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 351 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`453 kg | ~ 2`620 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`558 kg | ~ 2`042 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 895 kg | ~ 578 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem more than Mercedes GLC. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 64 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |