Land Rover Range Rover 2021 vs Jeep Wrangler 2023
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jeep Wrangler has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 6.4 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Land Rover Range Rover is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 615 HP | 272 - 481 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 - 800 NM | 353 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 8.3 seconds | 6.4 - 7.6 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Jeep Wrangler. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.8 - 11.9 | 3.5 - 11.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Wrangler. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 284 - 295 mm (11.2 - 11.6 inches) | 242 - 282 mm (9.5 - 11.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 818 litres | 898 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 2050 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 80 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 209 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.9 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`453 kg | ~ 2`696 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`558 kg | ~ 2`134 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 895 kg | ~ 562 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem more than Jeep Wrangler. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |