Land Rover Range Rover 2021 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Tahoe can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Tahoe also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 3.0 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Land Rover Range Rover is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 615 HP | 277 - 420 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 - 800 NM | 519 - 623 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 8.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| In general, Chevrolet Tahoe are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Land Rover Range Rover. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.8 - 11.9 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Tahoe. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.35 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.06 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.93 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 818 litres | 722 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 3479 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Chevrolet Tahoe may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1638 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`453 kg | ~ 3`361 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`558 kg | ~ 2`589 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 895 kg | ~ 772 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Chevrolet Tahoe. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |