Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Mercedes G class 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 5.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 - 565 HP | 211 - 612 HP | |
Torque: | 450 - 740 NM | 530 - 1000 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | 5.3 - 9.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 12.8 | 11.2 - 17.0 | |
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 5.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes G class. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes G class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.95 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 33 cm longer than the Mercedes G class, 26 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 480 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 159 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes G class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 13.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes G class, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`157 | ~ 3`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 112 400 | 111 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
| |