Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Lexus LX 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 4.5 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Land Rover Range Rover is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 565 HP | 272 - 383 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 740 NM | 530 - 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | 7.7 - 8.6 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Lexus LX. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 12.8 | 9.5 - 15.9 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus LX. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 212 - 297 mm (8.3 - 11.7 inches) | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus LX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm shorter than the Lexus LX, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 701 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1943 litres | 1267 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover has 62 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 676 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Lexus LX. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`157 kg | ~ 3`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`379 kg | ~ 2`510 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 778 kg | ~ 840 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem less than Lexus LX. Therefore, Lexus LX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 94 000 | 102 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus LX has
| |