Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 565 HP | 258 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 740 NM | 510 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 12.8 | 7.5 - 13.8 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover 2012. On average, Land Rover Range Rover 2017 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.05 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover 2017 and Land Rover Range Rover 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2017 has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover 2017 has 89 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`157 | ~ 3`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 112 400 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |