Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 vs Subaru Forester 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Velar) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Forester) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 68 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 248 NM more than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.1 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 735 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1798 litres | 1731 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 67 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 1.1 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`870 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 31 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |