Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 vs Subaru Forester 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover Velar) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Subaru Forester) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 150 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 206 NM more than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 16.40 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 3000 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 625 litres | 509 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1693 litres | 1779 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`720 kg | 2`185 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`158 kg | 1`658 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 562 kg | 527 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |